QFieldCloudvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QFieldCloud | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 246 | 56 874 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +145 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.
QFieldCloud ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+145 stars in 30 days).
QFieldCloud details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep QFieldCloud, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with