QFieldCloudvsTwenty
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QFieldCloud | Twenty | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 246 | 60 023 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 635 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Twenty scores 84/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Twenty is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.
Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 635 stars in 30 days).
QFieldCloud details →Twenty details →
Swap a project
Keep QFieldCloud, compare it with
Keep Twenty, compare it with