QFieldCloudvsShields
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QFieldCloud | Shields | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #6 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 246 | 27 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +125 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Shields scores 80/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.
QFieldCloud ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shields.
If you want the quickest setup, Shields is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.
Shields is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).
QFieldCloud details →Shields details →
Swap a project
Keep QFieldCloud, compare it with
Keep Shields, compare it with