pyroscopevsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pyroscope | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 11 711 | 53 710 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +325 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.4.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 73/100 for pyroscope, so it is the safer default.
pyroscope ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for WindowsinDocker.
If you want the quickest setup, pyroscope is easier to run; WindowsinDocker needs more configuration.
WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+325 stars in 30 days).
pyroscope details →WindowsinDocker details →
Swap a project
Keep pyroscope, compare it with
Keep WindowsinDocker, compare it with