openobservevspyroscope
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openobserve | pyroscope | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 22 553 | 11 711 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +436 | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.4.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
openobserve scores 78/100 against 73/100 for pyroscope, so it is the safer default.
openobserve ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for pyroscope.
If you want the quickest setup, pyroscope is easier to run; openobserve needs more configuration.
openobserve is growing faster right now (+436 stars in 30 days).
openobserve details →pyroscope details →
Swap a project
Keep openobserve, compare it with
Keep pyroscope, compare it with