pyroscopevsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pyroscope | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 11 711 | 93 034 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +1 287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 19 |
| Latest release | v2.4.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 73/100 for pyroscope, so it is the safer default.
pyroscope ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 287 stars in 30 days).
pyroscope details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep pyroscope, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with