PulumivsRabbitMQ
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pulumi | RabbitMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Infrastructure | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 25 829 | 13 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +30 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 14 |
| Latest release | v3.273.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Pulumi scores 78/100 against 77/100 for RabbitMQ, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pulumi.
RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).
Pulumi details →RabbitMQ details →