RabbitMQvsTeleport
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RabbitMQ | Teleport | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Message Broker | #4 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 13 949 | 21 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +104 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 76/100 for Teleport, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Teleport.
If you want the quickest setup, RabbitMQ is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.
RabbitMQ details →Teleport details →
Swap a project
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with
Keep Teleport, compare it with