LXCvsRabbitMQ
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LXC | RabbitMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Containers | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 5 288 | 13 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 14 |
| Latest release | v7.0.0 · 30 Apr 2026 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | C | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 70/100 for LXC, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for LXC.
If you want the quickest setup, RabbitMQ is easier to run; LXC needs more configuration.
RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).
LXC details →RabbitMQ details →
Swap a project
Keep LXC, compare it with
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with