PulsevsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pulse | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 6 970 | 41 139 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +229 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 | 76 |
| Latest release | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 43 for Pulse.
If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; ToolJet needs more configuration.
Pulse details →ToolJet details →
Swap a project
Keep Pulse, compare it with
Keep ToolJet, compare it with