PulsevsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pulse | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 973 | 95 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +232 | +2 347 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 | 25 |
| Latest release | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.
Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Stirling-PDF.
If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 347 stars in 30 days).
Pulse details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep Pulse, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with