PruneMatevsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PruneMate | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Docker Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 468 | 95 266 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 353 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 25 |
| Latest release | V1.3.3 · 15 Feb 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | HTML | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 46/100 for PruneMate, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PruneMate.
If you want the quickest setup, PruneMate is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 353 stars in 30 days).
PruneMate details →Stirling-PDF details →