ProxMenuxvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ProxMenux | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Backup Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 3 241 | 24 037 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +777 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.2.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 62/100 for ProxMenux, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ProxMenux.
If you want the quickest setup, ProxMenux is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+777 stars in 30 days).
ProxMenux details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep ProxMenux, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with