Project N.O.M.A.D.vsSlipshow
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Project N.O.M.A.D. | Slipshow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #11 of 38 in Personal Productivity |
| GitHub stars | 41 143 | 901 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 929 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 | v0.13.0 · 5 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | OCaml |
Which one should you pick?
Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 52/100 for Slipshow, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Slipshow is easier to run; Project N.O.M.A.D. needs more configuration.
Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 929 stars in 30 days).
Project N.O.M.A.D. details →Slipshow details →
Swap a project
Keep Project N.O.M.A.D., compare it with
Keep Slipshow, compare it with