Project N.O.M.A.D.vsretroassembly
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Project N.O.M.A.D. | retroassembly | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #5 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 41 202 | 1 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 851 | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
Project N.O.M.A.D. ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Project N.O.M.A.D. needs more configuration.
Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 851 stars in 30 days).
Project N.O.M.A.D. details →retroassembly details →
Swap a project
Keep Project N.O.M.A.D., compare it with
Keep retroassembly, compare it with