ReadMeABookvsTrilium Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ReadMeABook | Trilium Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 38 601 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +645 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 14 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Trilium Notes scores 83/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Trilium Notes.
If you want the quickest setup, Trilium Notes is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
Trilium Notes is growing faster right now (+645 stars in 30 days).
ReadMeABook details →Trilium Notes details →
Swap a project
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with
Keep Trilium Notes, compare it with