PostgRESTvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PostgREST | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in API | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 27 733 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 11 |
| Latest release | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Haskell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
PostgREST details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep PostgREST, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with