Portainervswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Portainer | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 44 in Container Management | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 38 737 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +188 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 10 |
| Latest release | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 | v3.19.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Zlib | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Portainer scores 77/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
Portainer details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Portainer, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with