Docker Enginevswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Docker Engine | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 72 220 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 10 |
| Latest release | docker-v29.9.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | v3.19.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Docker Engine scores 80/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
Docker Engine ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Docker Engine needs more configuration.
Docker Engine details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Docker Engine, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with