PipesvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pipes | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 41 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 76 |
| Latest release | — | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 44/100 for Pipes, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Pipes.
If you want the quickest setup, ToolJet is easier to run; Pipes needs more configuration.
ToolJet is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
Pipes details →ToolJet details →