Pipesvssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pipes | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 44/100 for Pipes, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; Pipes needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
Pipes details →sdnext details →