FreshRSSvssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| FreshRSS | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 85 in Feed Reader | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 16 438 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +312 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.30.4 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
FreshRSS scores 79/100 against 71/100 for sdnext, so it is the safer default.
FreshRSS ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, FreshRSS is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
FreshRSS is growing faster right now (+312 stars in 30 days).
FreshRSS details →sdnext details →