pidoorsvsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted Security projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pidoors | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 36/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #69 of 78 in Security | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 26 | 16 062 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +247 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 31 |
| Latest release | v0.4.11 · 12 Sept 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 36/100 for pidoors, so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for pidoors.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; pidoors needs more configuration.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+247 stars in 30 days).
pidoors details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →All Security projects →
Swap a project
Keep pidoors, compare it with
Keep Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), compare it with