Pi-holevsrudderstack
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | rudderstack | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 61 544 | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +482 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 39 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+482 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →rudderstack details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep rudderstack, compare it with