docker-pi-holevsrudderstack
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | rudderstack | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 39 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →rudderstack details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep rudderstack, compare it with