AdGuard Homevsrudderstack
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AdGuard Home | rudderstack | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 37 823 | 4 509 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +764 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 39 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0-b.1 · 30 Sept 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
AdGuard Home scores 84/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for AdGuard Home.
If you want the quickest setup, AdGuard Home is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
AdGuard Home is growing faster right now (+764 stars in 30 days).
AdGuard Home details →rudderstack details →
Swap a project
Keep AdGuard Home, compare it with
Keep rudderstack, compare it with