PhotoPrismvsQtap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PhotoPrism | Qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 40 372 | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
PhotoPrism ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.
If you want the quickest setup, PhotoPrism is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).
PhotoPrism details →Qtap details →