QtapvsSonarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Qtap | Sonarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 465 | 17 479 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +966 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 34 |
| Latest release | — | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | C |
Which one should you pick?
Sonarr scores 81/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.
If you want the quickest setup, Sonarr is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
Sonarr is growing faster right now (+966 stars in 30 days).
Qtap details →Sonarr details →