PeerTubevsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PeerTube | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 15 374 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +44 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 2 |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
PeerTube scores 75/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
PeerTube is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).
PeerTube details →url-to-png details →