avideovsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 2 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
avideo scores 58/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
avideo is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with