Payload CMSvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Payload CMS | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Headless CMS | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 45 573 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +641 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.92.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Payload CMS scores 83/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Payload CMS ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
Payload CMS is growing faster right now (+641 stars in 30 days).
Payload CMS details →Scada-LTS details →