GhostvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ghost | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 42 in Content Management | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 55 632 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +208 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.73.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Ghost scores 83/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Ghost ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
Ghost is growing faster right now (+208 stars in 30 days).
Ghost details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep Ghost, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with