paperclipvsQMReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| paperclip | QMReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 108 301 | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 937 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 12 |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
paperclip scores 88/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.
QMReader ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for paperclip.
paperclip is growing faster right now (+26 937 stars in 30 days).
paperclip details →QMReader details →
Swap a project
Keep paperclip, compare it with
Keep QMReader, compare it with