openclawvsQMReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | QMReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 393 292 | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 944 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 12 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for QMReader.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 944 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →QMReader details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep QMReader, compare it with