PaddleOCRvsTrenova
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | Trenova | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #2 of 2 in Fleet Management |
| GitHub stars | 91 868 | 314 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +427 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v0.10.5 · 13 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 41/100 for Trenova, so it is the safer default.
Trenova ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for PaddleOCR.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; Trenova needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+427 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →Trenova details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep Trenova, compare it with