PaddleOCRvsTraceRoot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | TraceRoot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #11 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 91 938 | 1 138 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +497 | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v1.3.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 58/100 for TraceRoot, so it is the safer default.
TraceRoot ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PaddleOCR.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; TraceRoot needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →TraceRoot details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep TraceRoot, compare it with