PaddleOCRvsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 91 926 | 11 123 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +485 | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 12 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for PaddleOCR.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+485 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with