PaddleOCRvsretroassembly
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | retroassembly | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #5 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 91 912 | 1 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +471 | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 3 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; PaddleOCR needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →retroassembly details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep retroassembly, compare it with