Paperless-ngxvsretroassembly
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Paperless-ngx | retroassembly | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 46 in Document Management | #5 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 47 267 | 1 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 276 | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 3 |
| Latest release | v3.3.4 · 22 Oct 2026 | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Paperless-ngx scores 86/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
Paperless-ngx ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Paperless-ngx needs more configuration.
Paperless-ngx is growing faster right now (+1 276 stars in 30 days).
Paperless-ngx details →retroassembly details →
Swap a project
Keep Paperless-ngx, compare it with
Keep retroassembly, compare it with