OwncastvsScreenTinker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Owncast | ScreenTinker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #4 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 11 632 | 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.3.0 · 2 Sept 2026 | v3.0.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Owncast scores 73/100 against 53/100 for ScreenTinker, so it is the safer default.
ScreenTinker ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Owncast.
If you want the quickest setup, Owncast is easier to run; ScreenTinker needs more configuration.
Owncast is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).
Owncast details →ScreenTinker details →