OTOBOvsSyslog-ng
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OTOBO | Syslog-ng | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 9 in Helpdesk | #3 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 340 | 2 386 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +10 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | rel-11_0_15 · 4 Feb 2026 | syslog-ng-4.12.0 · 16 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Perl | C |
Which one should you pick?
Syslog-ng scores 66/100 against 54/100 for OTOBO, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Syslog-ng is easier to run; OTOBO needs more configuration.
Syslog-ng is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).
OTOBO details →Syslog-ng details →
Swap a project
Keep OTOBO, compare it with
Keep Syslog-ng, compare it with