OTOBOvssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OTOBO | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 9 in Helpdesk | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 340 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | rel-11_0_15 · 4 Feb 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Perl | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 54/100 for OTOBO, so it is the safer default.
OTOBO ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; OTOBO needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
OTOBO details →sdnext details →
Swap a project
Keep OTOBO, compare it with
Keep sdnext, compare it with