OtoDockvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OtoDock | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #104 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 195 | 56 878 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +149 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.9.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 49/100 for OtoDock, so it is the safer default.
OtoDock ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; OtoDock needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+149 stars in 30 days).
OtoDock details →Typst details →