OrcavsR2R
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | R2R | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 109 139 | 8 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 232 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; R2R needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 232 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep R2R, compare it with