langflowvsR2R
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | R2R | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 156 117 | 8 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +926 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.
langflow is growing faster right now (+926 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →R2R details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep R2R, compare it with