OrcavsPrint Farm Manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | Print Farm Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #17 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 109 348 | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 441 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 2 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 47/100 for Print Farm Manager, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Print Farm Manager.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; Print Farm Manager needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 441 stars in 30 days).
Orca details →Print Farm Manager details →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep Print Farm Manager, compare it with