OrcavsPhotoMigrator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | PhotoMigrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #21 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 109 453 | 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 546 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 | v4.7.0 · 19 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 50/100 for PhotoMigrator, so it is the safer default.
PhotoMigrator ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Orca.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; PhotoMigrator needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 546 stars in 30 days).
Orca details →PhotoMigrator details →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep PhotoMigrator, compare it with