openvoxvszookeeper
Two self-hosted Configuration Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openvox | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 198 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | 9.2.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 53/100 for openvox, so it is the safer default.
openvox ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, zookeeper is easier to run; openvox needs more configuration.
zookeeper is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).
openvox details →zookeeper details →All Configuration Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep openvox, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with