Semaphore UIvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Semaphore UI | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 334 | 12 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +151 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Semaphore UI and zookeeper score the same (73/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Semaphore UI ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
Semaphore UI is growing faster right now (+151 stars in 30 days).
Semaphore UI details →zookeeper details →