openvoxvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openvox | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 8 in Configuration Management | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 199 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | 9.2.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Scada-LTS scores 55/100 against 53/100 for openvox, so it is the safer default.
openvox ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; openvox needs more configuration.
openvox details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep openvox, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with